Insuficiencia aórtica aguda por endocarditis infecciosa / Acute aortic regurgitation due to infective endocarditis

La insuficiencia aórtica aguda (IAOA) por endocarditis infecciosa (EI) es grave y generalmente requiere tratamiento quirúrgico. Se compararon los pacientes con IAOA grave por EI e insuficiencia cardíaca (IC) en clase funcional I-II NYHA (G1) con los pacientes en clase funcional III-IV (G2) en relación a características clínicas, ecocardiográficas, microbiológicas y evolución hospitalaria y se evaluaron los predictores de mortalidad, en un centro de alta complejidad. Desde 06/92 a 07/16, de 439 pacientes con EI, 86 presentaron IAOA: (G1, 39: 45.4% y G2, 47: 54.7%). El G1 presentó mayor EI protésica (43.6% vs. 17.0%; p < 0.01). Los 47 casos G2 presentaban disnea vs. 12 (30.8%) G1 (p < 0.0001). No hubo diferencias en cuanto a las características clínicas, ecocardiográficas y microbiológicas. El tratamiento quirúrgico fue principalmente por extensión de la infección y/disfunción valvular en el G1 y por IC en el G2. La mortalidad hospitalaria fue del 15.4% vs. 27.7% (G1 y G2 respectivamente, p NS). Fueron predictores en el análisis multivariado: la infección intrahospitalaria (p 0.001), los hemocultivos negativos (p 0.004) y la presencia de IC clase funcional III-IV (p 0.039).Una quinta parte de los pacientes con EI presentaron IAOA. Aquellos con IC grave requirieron tratamiento quirúrgico de emergencia y con IC con clase funcional I-II requirieron cirugía por extensión de la infección y/o disfunción valvular. La mortalidad quirúrgica y hospitalaria continúan siendo elevadas en ambos grupos y fueron predictores de mortalidad hospitalaria: la infección intrahospitalaria, los hemocultivos negativos y la IC avanzada.

Acute aortic regurgitation (AAR) due to infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious disease and usually requires surgical treatment. Our study aims to compare the clinical, echocardiographic, and microbiological characteristics as well as in-hospital outcome of patients with AAR according to the severity of heart failure (HF) and to evaluate predictors of in-hospital mortality in a tertiary centre. In a prospective analysis, we compared patients with NYHA functional class I-II HF (G1) vs. functional class III-IV HF (G2). From 06/92 to 07/16, 439 patients with IE were hospitalized; 86 presented AAR: (G1, 39: 45.4% y G2, 47: 54.7%). The G1 had higher prosthetic IE (43.6% vs. 17%, p 0.01). All G2 patients had dyspnoea vs. 30.8% of the G1 (p < 0.0001). There were no differences in clinical, echocardiographic and microbiological characteristics. Surgical treatment was indicated mainly due to infection extension or valvular dysfunction in G1 and HF in G2. In-hospital mortality was 15.4% vs. 27.7% (G1 and G2 respectively p NS). In multivariate analysis, health care-associated acquisition (p 0.001), negative blood cultures (p 0.004), and functional class III-IV HF (p 0.039) were in-hospital mortality predictors. One-fifth of the patients with EI had AAR. Half of them had severe HF which needed emergency surgery and the remaining needed surgery for extension of the infection and / or valvular dysfunction. Both groups remain to have high surgical and in-hospital mortality. Health care-associated acquisition, negative blood cultures and advanced HF were predictors of in-hospital mortality.

Does aortic valve repair in valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction compromise the longevity of the procedure?

OBJECTIVES: The effect of performing aortic valve repair in combination with valve-sparing operation on the length of time for which patients are free from reoperation is unclear. The objective of this study was to determine if the performance of aortic valve repair during valve-sparing operation modified the freedom from reoperation time. METHODS: From January 2003 to July 2014, 78 patients with a mean age of 49±15 years underwent valve-sparing operation. Sixty-eight percent of these patients were male. Twenty-two (28%) aortic valve repair procedures were performed in this patient population. In the aortic valve repair + valve-sparing operation group, 77.3% of patients had moderate/severe aortic insufficiency, while in the valve-sparing operation group, 58.6% of patients had moderate/severe aortic insufficiency (ns = not significant). Additionally, 13.6% of patients in the aortic valve repair + valve-sparing operation group had functional class III/IV, while 14.2% of patients in the valve-sparing operation group had functional class III/IV (ns). RESULTS: The in-hospital and late mortality rates, for the aortic valve repair + valve-sparing operation and valve-sparing operation groups were similar, as they were 4.5% and 3.6%; and 0% and 1.8%, respectively. In the aortic valve repair + valve-sparing operation group, 0% of patients presented moderate/severe aortic insufficiency during late follow-up, while in the valve-sparing operation group, 14.2% of patients presented with moderate/severe aortic insufficiency during this period (ns). In the aortic valve repair + valve-sparing operation group, 5.3% of patients presented with functional class III/IV, while in the valve-sparing operation group, 4.2% of patients presented with functional class III/IV (ns). In the aortic valve repair + valve-sparing operation group, 0% of patients required reoperation, while in the valve-sparing operation group, 3.6% of patients required reoperation over a mean follow-up period of 1621±1156 days (75 patients). CONCLUSION: Valve-sparing operation is a safe and long-lasting procedure and performance of aortic valve repair when necessary does not increase risk of reoperation on the aortic valve.

Paravalvular Regurgitation: Clinical Outcomes in Surgical and Percutaneous Treatments / Regurgitação Paravalvar: Análise de Desfechos Clínicos no Tratamento Cirúrgico e Percutâneo

Abstract Background: Paravalvular regurgitation (paravalvular leak) is a serious and rare complication associated with valve replacement surgery. Studies have shown a 3% to 6% incidence of paravalvular regurgitation with hemodynamic repercussion. Few studies have compared surgical and percutaneous approaches for repair. Objectives: To compare the surgical and percutaneous approaches for paravalvular regurgitation repair regarding clinical outcomes during hospitalization and one year after the procedure. Methods: This is a retrospective, descriptive and observational study that included 35 patients with paravalvular leak, requiring repair, and followed up at the Dante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology between January 2011 and December 2013. Patients were divided into groups according to the established treatment and followed up for 1 year after the procedure. Results: The group submitted to percutaneous treatment was considered to be at higher risk for complications because of the older age of patients, higher prevalence of diabetes, greater number of previous valve surgeries and lower mean creatinine clearance value. During hospitalization, both groups had a large number of complications (74.3% of cases), with no statistical difference in the analyzed outcomes. After 1 year, the percutaneous group had a greater number of re-interventions (8.7% vs 20%, p = 0.57) and a higher mortality rate (0% vs. 20%, p = 0.08). A high incidence of residual mitral leak was observed after the percutaneous procedure (8.7% vs. 50%, p = 0.08). Conclusion: Surgery is the treatment of choice for paravalvular regurgitation. The percutaneous approach can be an alternative for patients at high surgical risk.

Resumo Fundamento: Regurgitação ou escape paravalvar é uma complicação grave e incomum associada ao implante de prótese valvar. Estudos mostram incidência de 3% a 6% com repercussão hemodinâmica. Existem poucos estudos na literatura que comparam as abordagens cirúrgica e percutânea para sua correção. Objetivos: Comparar as abordagens cirúrgica e percutânea de correção da regurgitação paravalvar quanto a desfechos clínicos durante a internação e após 1 ano do procedimento. Métodos: Este é um estudo retrospectivo, descritivo e observacional, que incluiu 35 pacientes com escape paravalvar acompanhados no Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia entre janeiro de 2011 e dezembro de 2013 e que necessitaram de correção. Os pacientes foram divididos de acordo com o tratamento estabelecido e acompanhados por um período 1 ano após o procedimento. Resultados: O grupo submetido ao tratamento percutâneo foi considerado como de maior risco para complicações por apresentar pacientes mais idosos, com maior prevalência de diabetes, maior quantidade de cirurgias valvares prévias e menor valor médio de clearance de creatinina. Durante a evolução intra-hospitalar, observou-se grande número de complicações nos dois grupos (74,3% dos casos), sem diferença estatística nos desfechos analisados. Após 1 ano, o grupo percutâneo teve maior número de reintervenções (8,7% vs. 20%, p = 0,57) e mortalidade maior (0% vs. 20%, p = 0,08). Uma alta incidência de escape residual mitral foi verificada após procedimento percutâneo (8,7% vs. 50%, p = 0,08). Conclusão: A cirurgia é o tratamento de escolha da regurgitação paravalvar. A abordagem percutânea pode ser uma alternativa para os pacientes com risco cirúrgico elevado.

Veinte años de reparación de Ia válvula aórtica bicúspide insuficiente / Repair of the regurgitant bicuspid aortic valve: a twenty year experience

Introducción: La Insuficiencia Aórtica (IA) excepcionalmente es susceptible de reparación. Una de estas excepciones es la Válvula Aórtica Bicúspide (VAB). Objetivo: Analizar nuestros resultados de la reparación de la VAB insuficiente. Método: Se revisó la Base de Datos para el período enero 1994 a Julio 2014. Se identificaron 29 pacientes y se revisaron las fichas clínicas y protocolos operatorios. La supervivencia se certificó en el Registro Civil e Identificación de Chile. Resultados: Todos los pacientes fueron hombres. La edad promedio fue 39,4 años (19- 61 años). Cinco pacientes presentaban una endocarditis. El ecocardiograma preoperatorio demostró IA severa en 25 casos (86%) y moderada en 4. El diámetro sis-tólico fue 44 ± 7,1 mm y el diastólico 67,8 ± 6,7 mm. La fracción de acortamiento fue 35,96 ± 5,54%. En todos los casos la VAB presentaba fusión del velo coronariano izquierdo y derecho con rafe medio; en 3, el rafe era incompleto produciéndose un cleft. En 23 casos (79%) la IA era secundaria a prolapso del velo fusionado, en 3 a perforación de velo, en 1 a un cleft y en 2 a perforación y cleft. En 23 casos (79%) se efectuó una resección triangular y en 16 (55%) se complementó con una anuloplastía. En 3 se cerró una perforación y en otros 3 se efectuó un cierre primario de cleft. En 10 casos se realizó un procedimiento asociado. En todos los casos se realizó un ecocardiograma transesofágico intra-operato-rio. En 35% no hubo insuficiencia aórtica residual y en 65% esta fue mínima o leve. No hubo mortalidad operatoria. El seguimiento se completó en el 100%. Dos pacientes (7%) fallecieron por causas no cardiacas. Siete (24%) fueron re-operados, en promedio a los 7,14 años. La media de supervivencia fue 19,3 años (IC95% 17,6-21) y la supervivencia libre de re-operación 15,8 años (IC95% 13-18,7), a 20,6 años de seguimiento. El ecocardiograma efectuado en promedio a los 4,9 años demostró una reducción del diámetro sistólico de 6,15 ± 7,2 mm (p<0,05), del diastólico de 11,26 ± 8,7 mm (p<0,05) y de la fracción de acortamiento de 1,12 ± 5,57% (p<0,33). De los 22 pacientes no reoperados, 9 no tenían IA, en 6 esta era leve (1+) y en 3 leve a moderada (2+); 4 pacientes tenían una estenosis aórtica leve. Conclusión: La reparación quirúrgica de la válvula aortica bicúspide insuficiente tiene baja mortalidad peri-operatoria y excelente supervivencia alejada. Si bien el 24% de los pacientes requirió una re-operación, esta fue tardía en la mayoría de los casos.

Background: Aortic insufficiency (AI) is rarely amenable to surgical repair. One of the exceptions to that statement is the bicuspid aortic valve Aim: to analyze our results in the repair of a regur-gitant bicuspid aortic valve Method: A review of the cardiac surgery data base in the period January 1994 to July 2014 allowed the identification of 29 patients with AI and a bicuspid aortic valve submitted to surgical repair. The data from the clinical record and the surgical report was analyzed. Survival was established from the National Identification Service. Results: all patients were males. Mean age was 39.4 years (range 19-61). Five patients had infective endocarditis. Preoperative echocardiography revealed severe AI in 25 patients (86%) and moderate AI in 4. Left ventricular diastolic and systolic diameters were 67,8 ± 6,7 and 44 ± 7,1 mm, respectively. All patients presented fusion of the left and right leaflets with mid rafhe, and 3 patients had an incomplete rafhe with a cleft. AI was caused by prolapsed fu-sioned leaflet in 23 patients, leaflet perforation in 3, cleft in one and perforation plus cleft in 2 patients. Triangular resection was performed in 23 (79%) and complemented by annuloplasty in 16 (55%) patients. Three patients underwent closure of a perforation and 3 a repair of the cleft. An additional surgical procedure was performed in 10 patients. All patients underwent intra-operative TEE. 35% had no residual AI and 65% had minimal or mild AI. There was no surgical mortality. Follow up was completed in all patients. Two patients (7%) died from non cardiac causes. Seven patients (24%) had to be re-operated on, a mean of 7.1 years after the initial surgery. Mean survival rate was 19.3 (95% CI 17.6-21), and mean survival free from re-operation was 15.8 years (95%CI 13-18.7) at 20.6 years of follow up. Echo-cardiogram performed at a mean of 4.9 years after surgery showed a reduction of LV systolic diameter of 6,15 ± 7,2 mm (p<0,05), LV diastolic diameter of 11,26 ± 8,7 mm (p<0,05) and fractional shortening of 1,12 ± 5,57% (p<0,33). In the group of 22 patients who did not have a re-operation, AI was absent in 9, mild in 6 and moderate in 3; 4 patients had mild aortic stenosis. Conclusion: Surgical repair of the regurgitant bicuspid aortic valve has low peri-operative mortality rate and excellent late survival. Reoperation, required in 24% of patients, occurred late after the initial operation in most cases.

Aplicabilidade do escore de risco de Ambler para pacientes com substituição valvar por bioprótese de pericárdio bovino / Applicability of Ambler's risk score to patients who have undergone valve replacement with bovine pericardial bioprosthesis

OBJETIVO: O estudo objetiva verificar aplicabilidade do escore de Ambler para pacientes que receberam implante bioprótese de pericárdio bovino no Instituto de Cardiologia do RGS/FUC e quantificar os fatores de risco. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo com 703 pacientes submetidos ao implante de bioprótese de pericárdio bovino entre 1991 e 2005, no Instituto de Cardiologia do RS. Em 392 pacientes, ocorreu implante aórtico, em 250, mitral e, em 61, combinado. Desfecho primário foi mortalidade hospitalar. As características estimativas do risco foram: idade, sexo, IMC, classe funcional (NYHA), fração de ejeção ventricular esquerda (FE), lesão valvar, hipertensão arterial sistêmica, diabete melito, função renal, ritmo cardíaco, cirurgia cardíaca prévia, revascularização miocárdica e/ou plastia tricúspide concomitante, caráter cirúrgico. Utilizada regressão logística uni e multivariada para quantificar fatores de risco preponderantes, pelo odds ratio (OR). RESULTADOS: A mortalidade observada foi de 14,3%, superior à prevista de valor 3% para escore médio 6 de Ambler, (p<0,01). Pacientes falecidos mostraram escore médio 8,26, superior ao dos sobreviventes, de 5,68. Características de maior risco foram cirurgia emergencial (OR=10,87), diálise (OR=6,10) e idade > 80 anos (OR=6,10). A área sob curva ROC para nossa amostra foi calculada em 72,9% (aceitável > 70%). CONCLUSÃO: A mortalidade prevista no escore de Ambler não é reproduzida no resultado observado, mas a curva ROC evidenciou que o modelo é aplicável. Fatores de risco preponderantes foram individualizados.

OBJETIVES: This study aims to verify the applicability of Ambler's risk score to patients who have undergone implantation of bovine pericardial bioprosthesis at the Instituto de Cardiologia do RGS/FCU. This study also aims to quantify the risk factors. METHODS: Retrospective study with 703 patients who had undergone implantation of bovine pericardial bioprosthesis between 1991 and 2005 at the Instituto de Cardiologia do RS. Aortic implant occurred in 392 patients, mitral in 250 and combined in 61. Primary outcome was hospital mortality. Characteristics used to estimate risk were: gender, age, body mass index (BMI), NYHA functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction, valvular lesions, systemic arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, renal function, cardiac rhythm, previous cardiac operations, and surgical priority. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to quantify preponderant risk factors by the odds-ratio (OR). RESULTS: The mortality rate was 14.3%, which was higher than the estimated mortality rate (3%, according to Ambler's mean score of 6, (p<0.01)). Patients who died presented a mean score of 8.26, which was higher than the survivors' average score of 5.68. Characteristics of increased risk were emergency surgery (OR=10.87), dialysis (OR=6.10), and age higher than 80 years (OR=6.10). Our sample indicates an area under the ROC curve of 72.9% (accepted value > 70%). CONCLUSION: The mortality predicted in Ambler's score was not reproduced in the observed results. However, the ROC curve provides evidence that this model is applicable. Preponderant risk factors were individualizated.

A insuficiência da valva aórtica na dissecçäo crônica da aorta proximal: troca ou reconstruçäo valvar? / Aortic valve insufficiency in chronic dissection of proximal aorta: valve replacement or reconstruction?

Com o objetivo de avaliar os resultados clínicos e ecocardiográficos tardios obtidos com a correçäo da insuficiência aórtica decorrente da dissecçäo crônica da aorta proximal, foram estudados 48 pacientes consecutivos operados entre janeiro de 1980 e dezembro de 1989, separados em 2 grupos de 24 pacientes cada. Grupo A - pacientes nos quais a valva aórtica foi preservada pela "resuspensäo comissural"; Grupo B - pacientes nos quais a valva aórtica foi substituída. Na avaliaçäo ecocardiográfica pré-operatória, os pacientes do Grupo B apresentavam grau de insuficiência aórtica, diâmetros ventriculares (sistólico e diastólico) e da aorta ascendente significativamente maiores do que os do Grupo A (p=0,03), sendo comparáveis nos demais parâmetros. A mortalidade hospitalar foi 12,5 por cento no Grupo A e de 4,17 por cento no Grupo B e a sobrevida aos 7 anos, respectivamente, 75,75 por cento + ou -9,82 por cento e 82,72 por cento + ou - 7,87 por cento (NS). A avaliaçäo clínica mostrou que, no pós-operatório, houve melhora significativa (p<0,001) e semelhante dos parâmetros dos dois grupos. A comparaçäo ecocardiográfica pré e pós-operatória tardia mostrou, da mesma forma, reduçäo importante dos diâmetros sistólico e diastólico do ventrículo esquerdo e no diâmetro da aorta (p<0,05), mantendo-se inalteradas as fraçöes de encurtamento e de ejeçäo ventriculares nos pacientes dos dois grupos. Nos pacientes do Grupo A, entretanto, houve persistência de insuficiência aórtica residual (p=0,03). Os autores concluem que, com as duas técnicas empregadas, o tratamento cirúrgico da dissecçäo da aorta ascendente com insuficiência aórtica associada permite sobrevida imediata e tardia satisfatórias e nítida melhora funcional. Nos pacientes do Grupo A, a insuficiência aórtica residual detectada à ecocardiografia näo produziu sintomas ou repercussäo hemodinâmica tardios e, desta forma, preconizam a preservaçäo da valva, sempre que tecnicamente possível.

Valoración postoperatoria mediante estudio ecocardiográfico de pacientes con insufi ciencia aórtica crónica / Postoperative ecocardiographic evaluation of patients with chronic aortic insufficiency

Se estudiaron 18 pacientes que se sometieron a reemplazo valvular aórtico con diagnóstico de insuficiencia aórtica crónica. Se realizaron tres estudios ecocardiográficoss antes y después de la operación. Dos pacientes fallecieron tardíamente (11.1 por ciento). Para poder determinar el pronóstico a largo plazo no fueron de utilidad la clase funcional, el grado de cardiomegalia, la hipertrofia ventricular izquierda en el electrocardiograma ni la presión arterial. De los aspectos ecocardiográficos el diámetro sistólico final del ventrículo izquierdo mayor de 55 mm sí fue útil para la valoración postoperatoria. Sin embargo, cabe considerar que cuando los pacientes sobrepasan los 55 mm el daño miocárdico es importante y, en ocasiones, no susceptible de mejoría después de la operación. Por lo tanto, se recomienda operar a los pacientes con insuficiencia aórtica crónica que rebasan los 50 mm de diámetro sistólico final del ventrículo izquierdo, independientemente de la sintomatología